• Our Practice
  • Our Team
    • Cameron Stracher
    • Andrew Lachow
    • Michelle Sawyer
    • Sarah Regan
    • Sara Tesoriero
    • Rachelle Pike
  • Media Matters
  • Client News

Cameron Stracher

Duke sings the “White Lotus” blues

Now that The White Lotus has wrapped, talk of Duke University is fading. But as attorneys who love both Duke and the intersection of trademark law and entertainment, we want to keep the conversation going.

Duke stirred controversy when a character in The White Lotus wore a “DUKE” sweatshirt during a tense scene. The university objected, stating that the use of its federally registered trademark could confuse viewers and falsely imply endorsement. Duke contended that the show’s use of its brand was “troubling, does not reflect our values or who we are, and simply goes too far.” Let’s unpack.

A trademark identifies and distinguishes the source of goods in commerce. For example, the Jack Daniel’s trademark identifies its whiskey brand. Most recently, in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products (2023), the Supreme Court emphasized that infringing use occurs when a trademark’s source-identifying function is undermined. In that case, the Court held that defendant infringed the Jack Daniel’s mark by using a logo intentionally reminiscent of the brand on its “Bad Spaniels” dog toys.

However, The White Lotus doesn’t use Duke’s name to identify the source of the show, so the VIP Products case doesn’t apply. Instead, under Rogers v. Grimaldi and its progeny, an artistically relevant use of a trademark in expressive works doesn’t violate trademark law unless it explicitly misleads consumers.

This principle was affirmed in University of Ala. Bd. of Trustees v. New Life Art, Inc. (2012), where the court found that realistic depictions of team uniforms in paintings did not violate trademark law. The same logic applies to Duke’s sweatshirt cameo—it has artistic relevance and does not explicitly mislead.

Duke’s concern that the scene was “troubling” or “went too far” is legally irrelevant. As courts have emphasized, artistic expression outweighs speculative confusion unless there’s a clear misrepresentation.

In short, Duke should brush it off, enjoy the publicity, and focus on what truly matters—next year’s basketball championship.

Services

  • Negotiation
  • Pre-Publication
  • Litigation

Practice Areas

  • Intellectual Property
  • Defamation
  • Privacy

Get in Touch!

    Cameron Stracher

    1133 Broadway, Suite 516
    New York, NY 10010

    (646) 992-3850
    email

    Get the Media Matters newsletter delivered straight to your inbox!

    The information presented on this website should not be construed to provide legal advice, nor does it constitute the formation of an attorney/client relationship.
    ©2025 Cameron Stracher. All Rights Reserved